Broadband over power lines moving a bit closer to deployment
Posted by Dennis Sellers
Jul 18, 2005 at 11:12pm
Could relief be coming to all the poor souls suffering from DUS (Dial-Up Syndrome) be on the horizon? Perhaps. The Houston Chronicle reports that a company called CenterPoint Energy is testing a system to bring high-speed Internet access to consumers through the electric wall socket.
The company that owns the power lines throughout Houston is running a pilot of the system in a Greenway Plaza-area residential neighborhood, offering Internet access at speeds more than one-and-a-half times the speed of services offered through cable modems. The technology, called broadband over power lines, or BPL, has long been used by power companies to monitor and manage their electric grids, Thomas Standish, chief operating officer of CenterPoint’s Electric and Information Technology business, told the Houston Chronicle.
But it wasn’t until recently that it could be used to offer high-quality data, video and voice services. “But where we really think it will work well is in such areas as remotely reading gas and electric meters and remotely turning on and off power service for customers in the competitive retail electric markets,” Standish told the Houston Chronicle.
BPL—which also goes by a few other names and acronyms such as Power Line Communications (PLC), Power Line Telecommunications (PLT) and Power Line Broadband (PLB) is a “carrier-current” system, a term used to describe systems that intentionally conduct signals over electrical wiring or power lines. BPL can be used for Internet access or to interconnect computers or other devices within a building—using that building’s electrical wiring.
When a person moves into a new apartment, it can take up to three days for CenterPoint to execute the new service order. With a BPL system, electric retail providers could potentially turn on the service themselves in a matter of minutes, he told Houston Chronicle.
“BPL gives you an instantly networked home without having to run new wiring,” said Raymond Blair, IBM’s vice president of BPL initiatives. IBM is partnering with CenterPoint to deploy and test the system.
High-speed Internet access is available to more than 95 percent of Americans, according to a recent study by the Federal Communications Commission. That means companies providing the service through a new medium, like power lines, have their work cut out for them when it comes to landing new customers, says Ron Cowles, an analyst with technology research firm Gartner.
“BPL will be a good solution for certain niches, like rural and hard-to-reach areas where other service providers have been more reluctant to go,” he told the Houston Chronicle. “But even BPL can be expensive to deploy in rural areas, much like DSL is for companies like SBC.”
There are three major categories of BPL, according to the AARL (the national association for amateur radio) Web site. Access BPL uses electrical distribution lines, overhead or underground, to provide broadband Internet access to homes and businesses. In-building BPL systems are designed to use the electrical wiring within a building to network computers. Control PLC operates below 500 kHz, and is used by electric-utility companies to control their equipment using the power-lines as transmission lines.
Electric companies have been working on implementing BPL for a decade. Since electrical current is transmitted at low frequencies (10 to 490kHz) data running at higher frequencies (1-30MHz) can travel through the same wire. In theory, you should be able to plug a modem into your wall socket, connect it to your USB or Ethernet port, and get online. In fact, earlier this year, the FCC endorsed BPL, theorizing that it would make high-speed Internet access more widespread than it is now.
Even if 95 percent of Americans do have access to high-speed Internet (which I personally find hard to believe), 5 percent of the U.S. population is a LOT of folks. It’s time to bring on BPL.
Thoughts? Write me at dsellers@macsimumnews.com
Also, don’t forget this week’s Macsimum News poll. We’re asking, “Do you want a video iPod?” The Wall Street Journal is reporting that such a device is on the way, possibly as early as September. Read our article here.
Adam Smith Says:
ARRL people are mostly complaining because it has not worked yet, but they are not against something that will work, even if it comes eventually. So you will continue to see the type of comment above this one until it does. Technology always advances, it does not retreat.
Posted on July 19, 2005
Robert Boylin Says:
Broadband needs more competitors in the local environments. Besides the advantage of electrical outlet flexibility the power companies can deliver power at different pricing throughout the day with this technology. Having an already existing billing service also simplifies customer’s services. In my area of Sacramento, CA there is no DSL service, nor any competitors to cable. The Houston test shows that they aren’t going to provide this service to just expensive rural customers.
Posted on July 19, 2005
ken2 Says:
My sister lives just outside of Houston and can’t get DSL or cable - something like this would be great for her. It would also be great for the delivering power company as her general area is rapidly developing and it gives them a chance to capture a very good market before the phone and cable companies move in.
For those of us that now have both cable and DSL options the third option will have a very nice downward pressure on pricing. I’m hoping for double the speed at $10 a month so waiting for the local power company is my only hope!
Posted on July 19, 2005
David Flack Says:
BPL has been a general failure from both an economic and technical point of view so far--not just in the US but in other countries. It would be nice to get more broadband into rural areas and lower its cost everywhere. Fortunately new wireless technologies combined with more fiber optic deployment will handle this nicely--and without jeaprodizing radio services that serve the public interest.
Posted on July 19, 2005
Juha Says:
In Finland broadband over electric wall socket is allready possible at least on city of Kuopio. Tho it cost more than normal broadband so it isnt very popular here. In coutry side it dosnt work yet, and coming high frequency WiFI is propably going to cover country side so this electric Internet isnt going to be a great success.
Posted on July 20, 2005
Fishlimbs Says:
I’d like to see some kind of broadband avaliable to people in more rural areas where cable and dsl won’t go. My girlfriend can’t get either.
Sure she can get Satilite internet but they have really high ping times and cost $100/month.
Posted on July 20, 2005
Micah Says:
People who claim that bpl is causing problems I’m to believe are just repeating what they’ve heard from someone else that oppose’s the new service (( maybe meter readers at electric company’s for instance ))
Posted on July 20, 2005
MacMan Says:
for everyone that opposes the idea I think you need to grow up, especially all the people posting on this site. Your just oppsed to something that could revolutionize the communications network but instead you think it might destroy your little way of life. Way to give it a chance. The technology is being created so that it may help someone who has a fixed income, living in a rural area, and cable/dsl might be too expenisve and hard to get to their area. Way to think openmindedly. More than likely if you trn your nose at this post then your the one I am talking to.
Posted on July 21, 2005
Þórgnýr T. Says:
I live in Iceland and this is already reality in our capital, and has been for the past 2 years. All the same it hasn’t grown as such, even though it is cheaper and technologically easier than setting up your phoneline and dsl.
It seems that the quality of the service here sucks, not to mention that the speeds are not even fair, in comparison to dsl.
Posted on July 21, 2005
Þórgnýr T. Says:
I was just checking the company’s website, which offers this service via electric plugs. And it seems they are laying it off, whereas fiber-optic internet is taking over. Most homes in Reykjavik, our capital, have it now. It’s faster, easier and such. Although they’re not laying it off completely they are slowly switching to fiber altogether.
Anyways, theyr website is http://www.fjoltengi.is if someone is interested, but it is in Icelandic. It seems they have no english version of theyr site.
Posted on July 21, 2005
Liam Says:
I spoke briefly with a person recently hired by a power company to work on just this type of thing. Apparently speeds are comprable to current DSL/Cable offerings and pricing, at best, would be competitive. While it would offer competition to the DSL/Cable operators, it would remain a tough sell to get end user customers to switch to the service.
In rural areas, though the service would be appreciated by those it helps, installation and set up fees would be extremely high as they would need to install a localized “switching system” to translate and boost the different frequencies and this system would require everyone in the immediate range of the system to subscribe in order to be anywhere near cost effective.
I was told this system is in place in some areas of Europe (as noted above) and has been fairly succesful in these areas where the infrastructure made it difficult for cable/DSL to be installed. I never researched this.
While I doubt the emergence of this within the US (could be wrong, though) I do find possible strength in developing countries where they could erect a power grid and instantly have high-speed access capable of internet and phone and television data without there being other independent companies provide those services.
Posted on July 23, 2005
Jennifer Says:
I would love it if this could become available. I live in a rural area where DSL and Cable are not available. Even a 56k modem is slow as the phone lines will only allow you to connect at 33k (on a very good day it might get to 36k).
Posted on September 18, 2005
Jennie Giles Says:
What are your prices for your Satilite internet?
Jennie Giles
Posted on November 05, 2005
Jack Carl Says:
Love it,if it ever comes to be. But I fear the dragons in its way.I live in a subdivision just outside the phone company’s reach, although they have a fibre-optic cable running next to my house and will provide a 56 K only, explaining that there aren’t enough “open ports” available at head office.What on earth does that mean? I just hope this development doesn’t go the way of the promised 100 mpg car.
Posted on November 06, 2005
Article Information
Comment on this Article Print this Article Email this Article Digg This
Contributor
Dennis Sellers
Dennis has been a newspaper editor/reporter (seven years) and teacher (seven years). He has over 4,000 magazine, newspaper and online articles to his credit. He has also covered the Mac and tech industries for over a decade for such online publications as MacCentral, MacMinute and now MacsimumNews.







Jack Beckman Says:
It’s ARRL (American Radio Relay League), and they’re against BPL, because the technology tends to wipe out any use of major sections of the radio spectrum. Those portions are used by Amateur radio operators and local emergency services. There is plenty of info about BPL at the site:
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/
I’m surprised you’d quote the site and not mention that there are major problems with BPL.
Until the electric industry can bring this to market in such a way that it doesn’t ruin the radio spectrum, it’s NOT time for this to come to market.
Posted on July 19, 2005